Monday, 12 May 2014
Digital Natives Essay
Digital Natives Essay
“What
should we call these “new” students of today? Some refer to them as the N-[for
Net]-gen or D-[for digital]-gen. But the most useful designation I have found
for them is Digital Natives. Our
students today are all “native speakers” of the digital language of computers,
video games and the Internet.”These are the words of Marc Prensky an American
writer and speaker on learning and education. He is best known as the inventor
and for the popular terms “digital native” meaning the generation who has grown
up with digital technology as a part of their everyday live.” and “digital
immigrant” which is the
generation that was born before the existence of digital technology and adopted
it to some extent later in life. This was further described
and explained in a 2001 article entitled “On the Horizon.”
Throughout the life of
Digital Natives they demonstrate being “native speakers” of the digital
language in three major ways:
v It
is portray in their diverse style of retrieving information and communication
v Natives
sense of identity differ when compared to that of immigrants
v The
way how natives manipulate technological devices when compared to immigrants
Natives retrieve
information and communicate with their peers very quickly when compared to
digital immigrants. Each method of communication allows natives to harness a different
set of capabilities and skills when communicating with others. Texting may be
better for communicating one idea while face book might be better for
expressing their thoughts and at the same time keeping in touch with a vast
number of friends worldwide. Text messaging, Black Berry Messenger, what’s up, twitter, face
book and other social medias has become some of the most important form of communication,
since messages can be sent and retrieved
promptly in circumstances where a phone call cannot be made or retrieved,
whether at school or work. Students are now living in a digital age;
therefore they sharpen their skills in the retrieval and analyzing of
information in a more rapid form. Natives are proficient in multiple tasking-they
are capable of jumping from one idea to the next as they think of things, they
can have the TV playing and their iPods blasting in their ear and it does not
create any form of distraction, it comes natural to them because they have been
practicing these skills all their lives. But digital immigrants are not wired
this way. Immigrants grew up learning one topic at a time, everything in order,
following a linear and logical progression. This learning style is commonly
referred to as “accent.” Immigrants tend to carry this with them throughout life.
Prensky (2001) stated “Student think and process information fundamentally
differently from their predecessor. These differences go far further and deeper
than most education suspect or realize.”
Furthermore natives
sense of identity differ when compared to that of immigrants; since natives view technology as
an extension of who they are, while digital immigrants view technology- cell
phones emails and the internet as tools that can be used to reach someone or
set up a “real” face- to-face meeting. Digital immigrants have to prepare
themselves to meet students at their level. Children need to progress in every
aspect of their life without feeling that they are being hampered .Therefore
instead of parent calling a child to come their place of work, that parent could
simply make a video call. Immigrants have to continually bear in mind that
children feel that digital meeting is just as real as an office meeting and
takes away the same meaning and feeling as that of an office meeting.
Educators have to find
creative ways of keeping students enthuse in the lesson to reduce the high
level of boredom so students can take away knowledge from the lesson that is
being thought. Students would rather do a research on the net or view a power
point presentation and engage in a discussion rather than listing to a teacher
just talking away. “This generation is much more comfortable sharing and
teaching each other than any previous generation” (Prensky, 2007). This creates
a struggle for Per-digital immigrant educators who have the task of teaching an
entirely new population who speaks a totally different language.
Students today have
countless needs which need to be met and in order to meet their needs a completely
new approach needs to be taken. Natives know that immigrants are not as
comfortable or familiar with technology as they are and as a result you will
find natives researching the next big facebook program, iPod or tablet
revolution, Xbox games, and the latest hype phone on the market.
Lastly natives
manipulate technological devices differently when compared to immigrants; because the present generation of students
is the first to grow up immersed in technology. They have always had the
computer, internet, cell phones, digital cameras and DVD players. This plays a
major role in eliminating all the challenges students may face in manipulating
technology. For this reason digital immigrant teachers have to play catch up to
be on par with digital natives. Students in today classroom grew up on “twitch
speed.” Students are able to work through any computer base activity within or
before the allotted time.
Computers
can support the variety of ways learners construct their own understanding. Students
that are able to manipulate Computer Software are capable of creating pictures,
sound, and motion which can make learning fun. In keeping students intrigued
teachers could include multimedia software in the lesson. This could contribute
richness and variety to students work and the learning process. Students can
build on their own understanding by using computers as resource tools.
Technology in the learning environment can
encourage cooperative learning and student collaboration. Classroom activities
that are structured for computers usage encourage collaboration and build on
learners’ desire to communicate and share their understanding.
One implication for the
teacher who teaches digital natives is; digital
immigrants failing to connect with digital natives in the classroom that
hinders the learning process from being productive. “Our students have changed radically. Today’s
students are no longer the people our educational system was designed to teach”
(Presky 2001). Immigrant educators take for granted that natives function and
process information the same way they do and of the belief that the method that
worked for them- teachers when they were students will work for their students
now, which is a wrong assumption since different kinds of experiences lead to different
brain structures. Natives find it difficult to focus on the lesson while being
taught by Immigrant instructors who makes the learning not worth paying attention to.
Digital Immigrants
needs to accept the reality that students can learn successfully while watching
TV or listening to music because they are wired that way. Immigrants did not
practice these skills in their formative years therefore it comes as a
challenge. Digital Immigrants think learning should not be fun, but why should they?
They did not spend their formative years learning with Dora the Explorer and
Sesame Street but that is no excuse for them to stay as accent, when a new world of
technology awaits.
One implication for policy makers in their
quest to equip digital natives with the required skills for the future is; if policy makers
fail to accept the new generation they will go on to make policies that do not
fit the educational scope of digital natives which will defeats the process of
equipping students with the required skill for the future. The current
educational system is no longer equipped to accommodate the changing needs of
this new generation of learners. Hence educational policy
makers have to optimize both the needs of the system and those of students
which can generate a positive outcome in the school system. Policy makers have
to look at ways to develop a high-quality curriculum framework that will
reflect the educational needs of digital natives in the classroom. In
developing a standards-based curriculum it will require
that immigrant educators change their accent style of teaching to facilitate
the new generation.
With the
knowledge and experience that the digital natives possess the policy makers can
capitalize on it and ensure that all students and teachers have access to the
different technological devices to enhance the teaching and learning process. Policy
makers could take the initiative of putting a system in place to train teachers
how to use the different technological devices, they must also ensure that
there is equity and equality in the distributing of equipment, in doing so all
the schools will be able to have access to the same quality of education as we
strive to meet the needs of digital natives.
According to Howard
Gardner (1983) there are eight intelligences, and his theory postulates that
students learn in different ways. Therefore instead of always chalk and talk
policy makers should integrate technology in the curriculum since our students
today are digital natives and can easily maneuver the devices. Policy makers need to do a more in-depth
investigation of students’ technological practices and a research into how
these technologies are capable of transforming students’ life. If policy
makers, in their quest to equip the digital natives with the required skills
for the future is materialized then this will result in better growth and
development in our education system.
Three ways in which teachers can integrate
technology in teaching and learning process to improve the quality of students
learning is as follows:
Online education portfolios- immigrant educators can demonstrate being speakers of the digital
language when, for instance a partially technological savvy educator can take a
computer course to build on prior knowledge. This will allow the teacher to
effectively upload class work, homework, students’ grades, record students gold
and achievement and have online discussion with students. With the infusion of
technology Students will become captivated with the lesson and eager to learn.
Students can upload their home work on the online portfolio if they will not be
present for school. Hence, with the integration of technology learning never
stops.
Teachers can choose from a variety of online portfolio
providers that will tailored to the needs of their classroom. The online
portfolios also serve as a platform for students to demonstrate growth, it also
encourages and facilitates the learners to participate and provide feedback on
their learning experience. Students can carry their online portfolios
throughout their learning journey and can use it to record, assess, evaluate
and for reflection. This will help to improve the quality of education our
students will obtain. The online portfolios have many advantages over paper
based options because they cost less and allow for more robust outreach and it
is amenable to a wider variety of formats including video, image, music and
other interactive features.
Multimedia presentations- teachers can create dynamic multimedia presentations that can enhance a classroom
lessons by providing materials beyond the textbook. This eliminates boredom in
the lesson and keeps the students’ interest alive. When students are able to
interface with technology it encourages them to contribute their ideas and
special skills to the learning. Multimedia presentations can bridge the gap
between different learning styles in the classroom and reach otherwise
reluctant learners. Therefore teachers have to constantly keep their lessons
“fresh.” Teachers are speaking the language of digital natives when they
successfully incorporate information from varied sources such as; the Internet,
electronic encyclopaedias, and familiar Microsoft Office System programs to
make their multimedia presentations more appealing and interactive to the
students as they take away knowledge from the learning process.
Smart board-when teachers
use the smart board it can lead to a more interactive lesson and presentations.
Smart board give students a hands-on approach to classroom activities. Because
the teachers can allow their students come up during a lesson and solve a
problem or write down class notes. In a case where a lesson is taught
and a student forgets vital information that was taught he/she could
simply go back to the smart board and retrieve previous notes. Teachers no longer have
to stand in front of chalk board to present information to students they can simply
walk up to the board and touch the screen with their finger, or the pens provided
and the information automatically pops up. Teachers are effectively speaking
the language of digital natives when they are capable of manoeuvre this type of
device to impart knowledge while “boosting” the learning process for students.
Therefore students learning information with technology will retrieve meaning
full information from the lesson, thus improving their quality of education.
Lesson Plan Assure Model
Lesson
Plan Assure Model
Lesson
Plan Assure Model
Subject: Principles
of Business
Topic:
Organization Chart
Subtopic: Introduction to Organization Chart
Grade: 10
Age Group:
15-16 year
Time: 15 minutes
Date: April 7, 2014
Analyze Learners
The lesson plan is prepare for student at the grade 10 level.
The class population is consists of 20 students. Principles of Business is one
of the prefer subject by students. They
always pay keen attention to this subject and they are eager to learn. Student
tends to have varied learning styles in the classroom such as visual and
auditory. Some students prefer view video and images meanwhile some students
learn best when they hear information. Therefore we plan the lesson plan to
meet each students needs.
Entry competencies
Students will:
Become aware of The Organization
Chart.
Learning Styles
Student tends to have varied learning styles in the classroom
such as visual and auditory. In order to ensure that each student actually
learns, we cater for everyone.
Objectives:
Students should be able to:
1.1 Accurately define what an
Organizational Chart is after the introductory activity.
1.2 Clearly
explain the rules of drawing an Organizational Chart after discussion.
1.3 Accurately
draw an Organizational Chart after class discussion.
1.4 Correctly assess the importance of
The Organizational Chart after class discussion.
Selected Media, Materials and
Methods
Projector: The teacher will use the projector
to allow the students to view PowerPoint presentation.
Computer: A computer will be used to run
slides on the overhead projector.
Digital Storytelling: the teacher will use this to give
an overview of an Organizational Chart
Speakers: With the aid of speakers the
students will be able to hear the clip clearly. The speakers will enhance their
learning experience
Marker: This will be used to write on the
whiteboard.
Whiteboard: to record students and
demonstration.
Ruler: This will be used to make partitions
on the whiteboard and draw straight lines.
Text book: This will be used as the teacher’s reference: Principles of Business text, by:
Karlene Robinson and Sybile Hamil, Unit 2 (page 52-53).
Major Concepts
Organization: An organization is a social entity that has a
collective goal and is linked to an external environment.
Organizational Structure: is a design of an organization,
which indicates formal, planned relationships between its personnel and the
function they perform in relation to each other.
Organization chart: is used to display, visually, the
structure of a formal organization.
Authority: is the right or power to command.
Responsibility: is the obligation to perform a task
efficiently, or to see to it that a task is performed efficiently.
Content Summary
Organizational
Chart is used to display, visually, the structure of a formal organization.
Every business whether large or small, has an Organizational
Chart. This should be appropriately displayed within the organization; it is
the duty of all employees to know the organization chart since it serves a
number of functions in a business such as: demonstrating the distribution of
power to concerned stake holders and established clear line of authority in the
company.
Rules for drawing organization chart
v
Charts
must show different levels of authority and different position of work within
organizations.
v
The
person or individual having the highest authority must be placed at the top of
the pyramid.
v managers
with the same level of authority are placed on the same level
v If boxes
are used to identify these managers, care must be taken to make them the same size
because large boxes would indicate more authority.
v Unbroken
line represents direct authority.
v broken line show functional relation
v Secretaries
and consultants who do not have direct authority are drawn to the side of the
main structure.
v Workers in
the various department or units in the organization are placed at the bottom of
the charts or at the lowest level.
v Supervisors
within the department or store of the functional area are drawn below the
functional area.
The Organization Chart shown above is a Simple Organization
Chart that shows how authority flows from top to bottom in an organization and
it gives or explains the designation of jobs within an
organization and the relationships among those jobs. For example the manager is
in charge of the supervisor while the supervisor is in charge of the clerks.
Importance of an Organizational
Chart
v
It helps build and
design the organization structure to meet the business' objectives.
v Organizational chart can guide the
employees to know their rights and responsibilities
v
It also shows the
relationships between the organization's staff members.
v
It helps divide the functions
of a company, enterprise or department.
Introduction
The lesson will be introduced with
a scenario which will be used to formulate the topic. Students will be probed
by the teacher to formulate the topic for the lesson. After the formulation of
the topic anything that the students did not understood from the scenario will
be cleared up through explanation by the teacher.
Step 1
The teaching strategies that will be used are Discussion,
Explanation, Questioning and Cooperative Learning.
The lesson will be introduced by scenario. After the introductory activity the
students will be questioned on what they have grasped from the scenario. Prior
knowledge can be used by the students to devise an answer which will be recorded
on the white board. Subsequently the teacher will ask the students to use their
responses to determine what they think the lesson will be. The teacher will
evaluate their responses and then establish the topic for the lesson.
Step
2
Students will be further questioned based on
the introductory activity to formulate a definition for Organizational Chart.
The responses of the students will be recorded on the white board by the
teacher. The responses of the students will be modified if necessary. Then the
teacher will show the definition of Organizational Chart on PowerPoint to the
students. Afterward the students will be given three minutes to copy the
definition off the board in their note books.
Step
3
After discussion
students will be questioned to decipher the rules of drawing an Organizational
Chart. Their responses will be recorded on the board and then students will
make comparison with the ones provided by teacher on a multimedia projector.
Subsequently students will be allotted two minutes to copy any rules from
multimedia presentation that was not brought out during questioning.
Step
4
Students will ask to construct
an Organizational Chart of their school after class discussion. Students will
be allotted four minutes to complete the task. The teacher will check the books
of the students to see if they are doing task that is required of them.
Following that the teacher will randomly select students to come to the board
and draw their organizational chart.
Step
5
Students will be
further questioned to assess the importance of the Organizational Chart.
Students’ responses will be recorded on the board. Following that a comparison
will be made between students’ response and that of the teacher which will be
presented on a power point. Teacher will then clear up any misconception if necessary.
Subsequently three minutes will be allotted to students to write the information
from the projector. The teacher will then show students a digital storytelling
of the overview of an Organizational Chart.
Lesson Summary
The lesson
will be summarized using the hand print strategy where students will sketch
their hands on a sheet of paper that will be given to them by the teacher. In
each finger on the sketch, the students will write what they have learnt from
the lesson. The students will place the main thing that was learn in the
thumb. The students will use five (5) minutes to complete this activity. The
teacher will collect the papers at the end of the five minutes. This will allow
the teacher to determine what the students have grasped from the lesson and
what each student think is the most important thing that they have learned.
Culminating Activity
Students
will be given four (4) Questions to complete, two short answer questions and
two true and false questions. The students will be given ten (10) minutes to
complete the activity in their notebooks.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)